Praxis Spinal Cord Institute is proud to announce the grant recipients from its Translational Research (TR) and Best Practice Implementation (BPI) open funding competitions. These open competitions were designed to address critical gaps in spinal cord injury (SCI) care by advancing innovative research, implementing evidence-based care, and fostering meaningful collaboration with persons with lived experience (PLEX). Praxis would like to express gratitude to the diverse clinicians and lived experience experts who formed the peer-review panels for these competitions. Their contributions helped us through a challenging selection process among the strong applications we received.

The two funding competitions were:

Translational Research into Neurorestorative Treatments
The objective of this TR competition is to fund a team planning grant to catalyze and translate clinical research on neurorestorative treatments harnessing the potential of precision health approaches, AI, or other innovative technologies. The goal is to submit a grant proposal to a larger funding agency so more Canadians can access these treatments.

Supporting Networks to Translate and Implement Evidence-based Care
The objective of this BPI competition is to promote implementation and advance adoption of evidence-based care that is meaningful to the local SCI community. Teams will build strong networks to facilitate and champion practice and policy changes, with the goal of optimizing delivery of care for Canadians living with SCI.









Translational Research (TR) Grant Recipients
























Grant Title Nominated Principal Applicant Affiliation
Abdominal transcutaneous electrical stimulation to alleviate neurogenic bowel dysfunction in people with chronic spinal cord injury Chester Ho University of Alberta
Comparative evaluation of non-invasive neuromodulation therapies to restore upper extremity function in chronic cervical spinal cord injury Jessica D’Amico University of Alberta
Canadian multi-centre study of nerve transfer surgery to restore upper limb function in cervical spinal cord injury Mike Berger University of British Columbia (ICORD)



Best Practice Implementation (BPI) Grant Recipients







































Project Title Nominated Principal Applicant Affiliation
Developing best practice guidelines for activity-based therapy in Canada Janelle Unger Western University
Pedaling forward: development of an interprovincial functional electrical stimulation cycling community of practice Hope Jervis- Rademeyer University of Saskatchewan
Bridging the gap for early identification and documentation of reaching, grasping and manipulation impairment and neurorestorative therapy needs among individuals with tetraplegia at SCI-IEQCC sites Cathy Craven University Health Network
Perimenopause/menopause and persons with spinal cord injury: co-creating priorities for clinical practice, research and knowledge translation Stacy Elliott University of British Columbia
Advancing consensus on the provincial approach to early decompression surgery in acute traumatic spinal cord injury in Alberta Kiran Pohar Manhas University of Alberta
Code Spine: a multi-faceted knowledge translation initiative for ‘Time is Spine’ Michael Fehlings University Health Network










Driving Impact through Collaboration

These grants represent the power of collaboration between researchers, clinicians, and PLEX, with a shared goal of advancing SCI care and research. Praxis extends its gratitude to all applicants and reviewers for their dedication to transforming lives through innovation. For more information on these projects and Praxis’ initiatives, visit praxisinstitute.org.


As a Praxis SCI Accelerate 2023 alumni, Harmonic Bionics gained direct insights from persons with lived experience (PLEX) and SCI clinicians—real-world perspectives that challenged assumptions and informed design decisions. Through the program, they discovered how critical it was to align technology not only with clinical needs, but with the priorities of the SCI community itself.

Before stepping into medical technology, Mark Hunter spent years working in semiconductor engineering—a field driven by innovation but lacking the direct human impact he wanted. The turning point came when one of Harmonic Bionics’ co-founders experienced an upper extremity injury and saw firsthand how limited rehabilitation options were. That’s where the idea for Harmony SHR started, Mark explains. “We saw a gap in rehab technology and wanted to build something that could truly improve patient outcomes.”

The team developed Harmony SHR, a robotic device designed to help patients regain upper extremity mobility after neurological injuries. Their initial focus was on power wheelchair users, thinking that was the biggest accessibility challenge. But when they joined the Praxis SCI Innovation Program, they realized they had more to learn.

What Real-World Feedback Changed


Praxis gave the team direct access to people with lived SCI experience, clinicians, and therapists—a critical step in ensuring their device would work in real-world rehab settings.

Through focus groups and user testing, they uncovered key areas for improvement:

  • Better Wheelchair Compatibility – The team adjusted arm positioning and base design to improve usability for patients in tilted and reclining wheelchairs.

  • More Flexible Patient Positioning – Instead of limiting the device to one setup, they refined it to work in various rehab environments and postures.

  • Stronger Market Positioning – The team shifted from a narrow focus on wheelchair users to a more adaptable, widely applicable device.


“We thought we had the right approach,” Mark says. “But hearing directly from users gave us insights we wouldn’t have gotten otherwise.”

Instead of making these changes after launch, Praxis helped them refine the product early, ensuring it was market-ready without
needing costly revisions.

“We didn’t have to go back and fix things later,” says Kylie, an occupational therapist at Harmonic Bionics. “We were able to make the right changes before going to market.”

Looking Beyond the Clinic: A New Vision


One unexpected takeaway? Patients expressed interest in a wearable, at-home version of the device—something the team hadn’t previously considered.

While Harmony SHR remains focused on clinical rehabilitation, this feedback has already influenced their long-term product vision.

“It wasn’t on our radar before,” says Mark. “But now, we’re asking ourselves: ‘How could we make this work in the future?”

The Praxis Experience for MedTech Founders


Mark’s biggest takeaway from Praxis? Talk to your users—early and often. Many startups make the mistake of building products based on assumptions, only to realize later they don’t fully meet patient needs.

“We’ve seen companies rush to market without talking to their end users,” says Kylie. “That’s how products fail.”

For Harmonic Bionics, Praxis wasn’t just another accelerator—it was a turning point.

“We joke that it felt like six months of free consulting,” Mark adds. “But honestly, the insights were invaluable.”

Now, with a refined product, a clearer strategy, and direct input from real users, Harmonic Bionics is moving forward with confidence— knowing their technology is built for the people who need it most.

About Harmonic Bionics


Harmonic Bionics is a commercial-stage robotics and digital health company that aims to unlock human functional capabilities through robotics. Our flagship product, Harmony SHR®, is a bilateral upper extremity exoskeleton that works with a patient’s scapulohumeral rhythm (SHR) to enable natural, comprehensive arm and shoulder therapy for those living with neurological and musculoskeletal movement impairments.
Sander L. Hitzig, Kirstin E. Yuzwa , Linda Weichel, Eva Cohen, Luke Anderson, Peter Athanasopoulos, Krista L. Best, Marco Chow, Anita Kaiser, Franca Tomasella, Sara J. T. Guilcher, Vanessa K. Noonan, Richard Joy, Anika Abdullah, Farah Bacchus-Misir, Amy Chan, Marnie Courage, Nikoletta Erdelyi, Deborah Fletcher, Siobhan Galeazzi-Stirling, Gary Gladstone, Jenn Green, Monte Hardy, Evelyn Harris, Jeffrey Kerr, Judi Lytle, Kyla MacGinnis, Gary Malkowski, David Rosenbaum, Julie Sawchuk, Mikiko Terashima, Yu-Ling Yin, Sue VanDeVelde-Coke, Christine L. Sheppard

DOI: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318458












Abstract



This article describes the development of priorities and actions to improve the state of research, policy, and practice related to accessible housing in Canada for persons with disability or with accessible housing needs. A modified Delphi approach with an expert cross-sectoral panel was used to gain convergence on a set of priorities for advancing the accessible housing field in Canada. This included circulating an anonymous pre-meeting survey (N = 49) followed by an in-person planning meeting (N = 45). The expert panel at the in-person meeting identified three clusters of priorities from an initial list of 21 priorities, which included: 1) engaging with all levels of government to support accessible housing efforts; 2) developing educational resources to raise awareness about accessible housing, and creating services to facilitate locating and acquiring accessible housing; and 3) fostering meaningful engagement across key interest groups and sectors to find solutions to enact positive change in this space. The findings provide an initial roadmap for bringing greater cohesion to the accessible housing field, which will enable cross-sectoral partnerships and collective action towards informing the next generation of accessible housing standards, regulations and practices for people with accessible housing needs.



Acknowledgments


The authors thank Dr Christiana L. Cheng for her scientific advice, critical review, and proofreading of the manuscript. We also thank the RHSCIR participants and network, including all the participating local RHSCIR sites: GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver General Hospital, Foothills Hospital, Glenrose We would like to thank Lorene Casiez from Human Space / BDP Quadrangle, Sarah McCarthy from the Rick Hansen Foundation, Brock Stevenson from the Daniels Corporation, Sean MacGinnis from BuildAble, and Rabia Munir from GWL Realty Advisors for their contributions to this initiative. The authors also would like to thank our staff and students from the St. John’s Rehab Research Program for their support, including Yomna Ahmed, Jorge Rios, Zoe Li, and Sarmitha Sivakumaran. Finally we would like to thank Jerry E. Mings from the Desk Consulting Group for his facilitation of the planning event.




Access Paper
Dionne, Antoine MD; Mac-Thiong, Jean-Marc MD, PhD; Hong, Heather A. PhD; Kurban, Dilnur MSc; Xu, Jijie MSc; Humphreys, Suzanne MSc; Bailey, Chris MD; Barthélemy, Dorothy PT, PhD; Christie, Sean MD; Fourney, Daryl MD; Linassi, Gary MD; Loyola-Sanchez, Adalberto MD, PhD; Paquet, Jérôme MD; Sreenivasan, Vidya MD; Townson, Andrea MD; Tsai, Eve MD, PhD; Noonan, Vanessa PT, PhD; Richard-Denis, Andréane MD, MSc; the RHSCIR Network

DOI: https://journals.lww.com/ajpmr/fulltext/2025/02000/is_the_level_of_consent_to_a_national_research.5.aspx












Abstract



Despite the growing recognition of housing as a significant concern for individuals with a spinal cord injury/dysfunction (SCI/D), there is limited research available on this topic. This scoping review aimed to idWe examined the impact of consenting to the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry on outcomes: acute length of stay, in-hospital mortality, medical complications (pressure injuries and pneumonia), and the final discharge destination following a spinal cord injury using the national Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry dataset.

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry participant data from 2014 to 2019. Participants approached for enrollment were grouped into 1) PC: provided full consent including community follow-up interviews, 2) DWC: declined community follow-up interviews but accepted minimal data collection that may include initial/final interviews and/or those who later withdrew consent, and 3) DC: declined consent to any participation. As no data was collected for the DC group, descriptive, bivariate, and multivariable regression analysis was limited to the PC and DWC groups.

Of 2811 participants, 2101 (74.7%) were PC, 553 (19.7%) were DWC, and 157 (5.6%) were DC. DWC participants had significantly longer acute length of stay, more acute pneumonias/pressure injuries, and were less likely to be discharged home than PC participants. All these associations—except pneumonia—remained significant in the multivariable analyses.



Acknowledgments


The authors thank Dr Christiana L. Cheng for her scientific advice, critical review, and proofreading of the manuscript. We also thank the RHSCIR participants and network, including all the participating local RHSCIR sites: GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver General Hospital, Foothills Hospital, Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Royal Alexandra Hospital, University of Alberta Hospital, Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon City Hospital, Winnipeg Health Sciences Centre, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton Health Sciences Regional Rehabilitation Centre, Victoria Hospital (London), University Hospital (London), Parkwood Hospital (London), The Ottawa Hospital Rehabilitation Centre, The Ottawa Hospital Civic Campus, Hôpital de l’Enfant Jésus, Institut de Réadaptation en Deficience Physique de Quebec, Institut de Réadaptation Gingras-Lindsay-de-Montréal, Hôpital du Sacre Coeur de Montréal, Nova Scotia Rehabilitation Centre, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Saint John Regional Hospital, Stan Cassidy Centre for Rehabilitation, St. John’s Health Sciences Centre, and L.A. Miller Rehabilitation Centre.


Data for this research/project was collected using the Global Research Platform http://www.rhigrp.net/.


Neurology data for this research/project was cleaned using the Praxis International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injuries Algorithm http://www.isncscialgorithm.com/.


The authors thank the Alberta Trauma Services Team and the Alberta Trauma Registry in providing data for the RHSCIR.




Access Paper
Ramtin Hakimjavadi, Heather A.P. Mputu Mputu, M. Beauséjour, A. Richard-Denis, N. Fallah, V. K. Noonan, J. M. Mac-Thiong

DOI: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09638288.2024.2320267

 












Purpose



Identify patient subgroups with different functional outcomes after SCI and study the association between functional status and initial ISNCSCI components.

Methods


Using CART, we performed an observational cohort study on data from 675 patients enrolled in the Rick-Hansen Registry(RHSCIR) between 2014 and 2019. The outcome was the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) and predictors included AIS, NLI, UEMS, LEMS, pinprick(PPSS), and light touch(LTSS) scores. A temporal validation was performed on data from 62 patients treated between 2020 and 2021 in one of the RHSCIR participating centers.

Results


The final CART resulted in four subgroups with increasing totSCIM according to PPSS, LEMS, and UEMS: 1)PPSS < 27(totSCIM = 28.4 ± 16.3); 2)PPSS ≥ 27, LEMS < 1.5, UEMS < 45(totSCIM = 39.5 ± 19.0); 3)PPSS ≥ 27, LEMS < 1.5, UEMS ≥ 45(totSCIM = 57.4 ± 13.8); 4)PPSS ≥ 27, LEMS ≥ 1.5(totSCIM = 66.3 ± 21.7). The validation model performed similarly to the original model. The adjusted R-squared and F-test were respectively 0.556 and 62.2(P-value <0.001) in the development cohort and, 0.520 and 31.9(P-value <0.001) in the validation cohort.

Conclusion


Acknowledging the presence of four characteristic subgroups of patients with distinct phenotypes of functional recovery based on PPSS, LEMS, and UEMS could be used by clinicians early after tSCI to plan rehabilitation and establish realistic goals. An improved sensory function could be key for potentiating motor gains, as a PPSS ≥ 27 was a predictor of a good function.

Access Paper
Sarmitha Sivakumaran, Tsione Kebede, Kirstin E. Yuzwa, Ella C. N. Wong, Christine L. Sheppard, Sara J. T. Guilcher, Peter Athanasopoulos, Krista L. Best, Anita Kaiser, Vanessa K. Noonan, Sander L. Hitzig

DOI: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/12/24/2537












Abstract



Despite the growing recognition of housing as a significant concern for individuals with a spinal cord injury/dysfunction (SCI/D), there is limited research available on this topic. This scoping review aimed to identify and describe the literature on housing across the continuum for people with an SCI/D. Methods: This review utilized Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review framework. Five databases were searched including MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL Plus (EBSCO), PsycINFO (Ovid), and Web of Science (Core Collection). In addition, Google’s Advanced Search function was used to search the gray literature, and reference lists from the included studies were scanned. A preliminary assessment of the Theory of Access (TOA) constructs and their relationships was conducted using Penchansky and Thomas’ Theory of Access and Saurman’s additional updates. An adapted version of this theory was developed by the research team to identify the types of studies that assess the TOA’s six constructs and was used to identify knowledge gaps to advance research in this field. Results: The search yielded 25,861 records, with 36 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Data analysis revealed the participants’ sociodemographic and impairment characteristics, as well as essential information pertaining to housing across the continuum for individuals with an SCI/D, both of which were inconsistently reported across the studies. Several studies (n = 18) reported on the influence of home adaptations on the health and well-being of individuals with an SCI/D. When framed within the TOA, issues of accessibility presented the most substantial barriers for the SCI/D community, followed by acceptability and availability. Conclusions: The findings of this scoping review suggest that housing is an understudied topic and that further research is required to generate evidence to better support the housing needs of individuals with an SCI/D globally.



Acknowledgments


The authors would like to acknowledge the support of Erica Nekolaichuk, a librarian at the University of Toronto, for their assistance in developing the scoping review search strategy.

Access Paper





Dr. Michael Beattie, PhD, has recently completed his term on the Praxis Board of Directors, where he also served as the Chair of Praxis Advisory Committee (PAC) while also working as the Director of research for Brain and Spinal Injury Center at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and a professor at Department of Neurological Surgery. As he begins his retirement and starts a new chapter with his life with his wife and research partner, Dr. Jacqueline Bresnahan, we thank him for his important contributions to Praxis.


Dr. Michael Beattie understands the power of teamwork.

With an academic CV that includes being the founding chair of the Department of Neuroscience for Ohio State University, working as the Co-Director and Director of Research for the Brain and Spinal Injury Center in the Weill Institute for Neurosciences and Department of Neurological Surgery at UCSF, and authoring more than 140 peer-reviewed publications, he’s lived it.

“Science is at its best when people work together, sharing knowledge for the betterment of humanity,” he says.

Throughout the course of his 50+ year career, Dr. Beattie has experienced this firsthand several times, even having the opportunity to work in partnership with his brother (Dr. Eric Beattie), wife (Dr. Jacqueline Bresnahan), and many other esteemed researchers and scientists.


“I met Jacque in the lab, and we have been together ever since,” he says. “We were Ohio people for many years, working our way up the ranks of Ohio State University, which was one of the first places to have a spinal cord injury research program funded by the National Institute of Health (NIH). It was a really a specific effort to get spinal cord injury recognized as an important research area by NIH, and something we are incredibly proud of.”



Dr. Beattie’s initial research focused on recovery of function from cognitive brain damage. While at Ohio State, this work involved research around how different molecules could potentially regulate the immune response to spinal cord injury (SCI). One aspect of this involved investigating TNF alpha, a natural immune system molecule that mediates inflammation Coincidentally, his younger brother was doing a postdoc at Stanford University on synaptic transmission and cultures of hippocampal neurons at the time.

“We decided to try to share notes and work together,” Dr. Beattie says. “The result was radical, and we discovered that TNF alpha altered the way that the neurons communicate.”

This discovery led to research that was published in a white paper entitled, “Control of synaptic strength by glial TNFa” and appeared in the journal Science in 2002 (E. Beattie et al, vol 295, no. 5563, pp 2282-2285). It also initiated a new avenue of research focused on how immune molecules change the body’s internal response to injury.

“My brother’s research supported a “repair” theme that Jacque and I had been focused on,” says Dr. Beattie. “The only way you can make real change in science is by sharing learnings and insights. This sometimes involves compromising, and giving up your ego, but the reward of improved health outcomes is worth it.”

In 2006, Drs Beattie and Bresnahan had an opportunity to relocate to San Francisco to join a group called the Brain and Spinal Injury Center at San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH), which boasts one of the nation’s premier trauma centers. This center is known for its clinical research in both SCI and traumatic brain injury (TBI), and runs parallel programs called TRACK-SCI and TRACK-TBI. Thousands of car crash, sports injury and other patients with spinal cord injuries are directed to the SFGH trauma center because of the specialization it offers. The opportunity to take basic biology and work towards benefits that could be translated into human spinal cord injury practice appealed to the husband-and-wife team, so they moved to start a new exciting chapter of work, which led to Dr. Beattie becoming the principal investigator on TRACK-SCI.

When it comes to spinal cord injury, initial care can set the stage for recovery. Ironically, it is the body’s own attempt to heal itself that can worsen a spinal cord injury by impeding signals between the nerves and brain. At SFGH, Drs Beattie and Bresnahan’s goal was to discover ways to save some nerve function, limiting paralysis, and considerably improving the quality of life as a result. This work led them to become the recipients of the 2012 Reeve-Irvine Research medal for excellence in SCI research.

Excellence in science has been defined as making discoveries, publishing them in important journals and receiving prestigious recognitions. Dr. Beattie expands this definition by adding effective collaboration, attributing his work as a board member for Praxis Spinal Cord Institute to increasing his understanding of how powerful true collaboration can be.









“The work that Praxis does to pull everyone working in spinal cord research together under a collective goal of improving the lives of persons with spinal cord injury is inspiring. By everyone I mean gathering input from clinical teams, researchers, and persons with lived experience, among many others,” Dr. Beattie says, adding that Praxis has pioneered a way of getting clinical data into a registry that is accessible and findable for all.



Dr. Beattie served on the Board from 2017, recently stepping down in the Fall of 2024 as part of his retirement planning. He and Dr. Bresnahan are now embarking on a new type of project, a home renovation.

“We bought a place a few years back on the coast of California and are remodelling it with the help of our daughters, who are both artists in different disciplines and have been using it for workshops. Wouldn’t it be great to create a space that brings together science, art and music?” he says, adding that this has become a new family goal.

And while Dr. Beattie may be passing the research torch on, he still talks enthusiastically about the research and work being done around SCI.

“Progress in research can’t be measured by time. I tell anyone entering the field of spinal cord injury research to carry on and not give up. We are seeing improved outcomes in the clinic every day. Focus should always be on progress; results will come with that.”

To Learn More, Visit Praxis News.







This past year, we focused on bringing inclusivity and engagement to the forefront, ensuring that the needs and priorities of persons with lived experience (PLEX) guide our work. As we prepare to welcome the new year, we want to take a moment to reflect on the remarkable progress that continues to make a difference.

At Praxis, we believe that the engagement and inclusion are essential to everything we do. Our efforts have centered on the mentorship and guidance provided by PLEX across all our key areas—innovation, research, cure, and care. This focus shapes both our internal initiatives and our external collaborations. Praxis is about translating knowledge into action, and we understand that, without inclusivity and engagement, we cannot ensure our work is truly meaningful to the SCI community.

This year, we focused on what matters most by:

  • Engaging with experts to support innovation, research and PLEX outreach

  • Empowering PLEX mentorship through our Innovation programs – Praxis SCI Accelerate and SCI Incubate,

  • Ensuring that PLEX voices are heard and represented for larger impact through research and

  • Recognizing and integrating lived experience into every aspect of our work. Read our annual report


A recent article published by Business in Vancouver (BIV) highlights the words of Spring Hawes, Praxis Regional PLEX Engagement Liaison, who shares that we cannot effectively develop solutions for persons with disabilities unless they are actively contributing to them. This philosophy is at the core of Praxis. Our work depends on finding solutions that truly make a difference for those living with spinal cord injury.

As we reflect on the year past, we are filled with gratitude for our partners, the SCI community, and especially those who live with SCI and guide us in this important work. Thank you for your continued support and collaboration. We look forward to working together to make even greater strides in the coming year.

Wishing you all a joyful holiday season and a bright new year ahead.

Bill Barrable
CEO, Praxis

James A. G. Crispo, Lisa J. W. Liu, Vanessa K. Noonan, Nancy P. Thorogood, Brian K. Kwon, Marcel F. Dvorak, Dylan Thibaul, Allison W. Willis, Jacquelyn J. Cragg

DOI: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neurology/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1264589/full












Introduction



Traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) is a debilitating neurological condition resulting in lifelong disability for many individuals. The primary objectives of our study were to describe national trends in incident emergency department (ED) visits for tSCI among children (less than 21 years) in the United States, and to determine the proportion of visits that resulted in immediate hospitalization each year, including stratified by age and sex. Secondary objectives were to examine associations between select characteristics and hospitalization following tSCI, as well as to assess sports-related tSCIs over time, including by individual sport and geographic region.

Method


We used the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Emergency Department Sample to identify ED visits among children between January 2016 and December 2020 for incident tSCI. Diagnosis codes were used to identify tSCI and sports-related injury etiologies. Census Bureau data were used to approximate annual rates of pediatric ED visits for tSCI per 100,000 children. Unconditional logistic regression modeling assessed whether select factors were associated with hospital admission.

Results


We found that the annual ED visit rate for tSCI remained relatively stable between 2016 and 2020, with approximately 2,200 new all-cause pediatric ED visits for tSCI annually. Roughly 70% of ED visits for tSCI resulted in hospitalization; most ED visits for tSCI were by older children (15–20 years) and males, who were also more often admitted to the hospital. Notable secondary findings included: (a) compared with older children (15–20 years), younger children (10–14 years) were less likely to be hospitalized immediately following an ED visit for tSCI; (b) patient sex and race were not associated with hospital admission; and (c) American tackle football was the leading cause of sports-related ED visits for tSCI among children. Our findings also suggest that the proportion of sports-related tSCI ED visits may have increased in recent years.

Funding


The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was funded by the Blusson Integrated Cures Partnership, a collaboration between ICORD and the Praxis Spinal Cord Institute. JCri was supported by a trainee award from Michael Smith Health Research BC. JCra was a Tier 2 Canada Research Chair and Michael Smith Health Research BC Scholar.

Access Paper